Agriculture
in Limbo
(20-July-2014)
Where is our agriculture heading to ?
On one end we have politicians, the academia,
agricultural market leaders, economist, socio-economic analyst and the list can
keep on increasing……saying “the humongous opportunity of our agricultural
products and it’s diversity has the potential of being successfully marketed
both locally and internationally”.
On the other end we also have voices grumbling about
the lack of activity of agriculture throughout the country and the situation
needs to be repaired otherwise we will loose our opportunity to supply to the
OIC countries, the ASEAN countries and will eventually loose our competitive
edge to compete. Even the halal business is being controlled by non-bumi
entrepreneurs and ironically we know that the consumers are 80 – 85 percent
bumiputras. Why can’t the bumis get into the halal business ? What is so
difficult. What has the Government done that the situation is like this ? WHY ?
So how halal is our halal food that is made
available to us ?
Even meehun produced by non-bumis and produced under
unhygienic conditions are being packed nicely with a mosque being printed as a
brand. Is this being allowed sparingly without much care and to disguise it for
the benefit of the muslim consumers.
So….what is/are our real problem(s) ?
Allah has bestowed upon us with a country that is
blessed with relatively very stable Government ever since the date of our
independence. Allah has provided us with good agricultural environment such as
good soil, plentiful of water supply for the agricultural use, right amount of
sunshine, abundance of natural flora and fauna and not to say the least…..very
limited natural disasters.
Again….what is our real problem(s) ?
Are we addressing the problem(s) at the root end ?
Meaning do we understand what the problems are ?
The Minister of Agriculture at one time wanted to
create a new university to address the agricultural problems. Will a new campus
under a different management and a new name make a significant difference and
impact to the agricultural scenario ?
The answer is….ofcourse NO.
It may even cause more problem(s).
It would mean more public funds will have to be used
to make a new university. The expertise just don’t grow off the tree….so you
have to manned the university from the current human resource pool of expertise
meaning from the existing professors and lecturers of UPM or even engage
already retired lecturers who may or may not be up-to-date which the technology
of the day.
I personally have heard that the agricultural
graduates of today is not as good as those of yesteryears. It is not that the
graduates are BAD but the way that the students were being recruited to be
students of agriculture in UPM or any where else and the way that they are
being trained or taught nowadays.
Prior to the 90’s……agriculture was one of the main
focal point. Agricultural education take precedence. Students were at one time
being interviewed just to get a place in Kolej Pertanian Malaya (KPM). One must
not discount the fact that during the bad times through the years since
independence till now…..I can say that agriculture has been there at the
doorsteps of foreign banks and foreign investors to save the nation. Rubber and
Palm Oil has always been there to be our perennial saviour plus the lesser
known crops but none-the-less contribute to the GNP. More credit and attention should be given to the
agricultural sector and agricultural education. This is a very serious matter.
Students were required to study basic sciences and
living sciences. Lots of emphasis were placed on practical trainings, vacation
job placements and integrated extention education.
Starting from the mid-80’s…..it seems as though the
emphasis was more towards leap-frog industrialization and during this time
agriculture lost its emphasis as a bread-and-butter business of Malaysia. It
was infrastructure…infrastructure and infrastructure. Even University Pertanian
Malaysia lost its name to University Putra Malaysia. Thus loosing its focus of pertanian in University Putra Malaysia.
A man can be dressed as an ULAMAK but does the dress
make him into an ULAMAK. We just pray that the man does not turn out to be ular
dalam semak. What I am saying is that the name change does not make a graduate
a better person….it is the training and getting the right person to be the
right agricultural graduate who will be in the field with the farmers…..that
should be the objective. Not a graduate who prefers to stay in the
air-conditioned office and controlling the farmers without going into the
field. This may be an over exaggeration but the meaning is important.
From my discussions with the VC and the Bursar of
UPM…..it was revealed that to get students to register for agriculture is a
real problem. Difficult to even get 800 students or so.
Why is this so ?
We have gone so call…..sophisticated by using
computers to choose the student candidates for all courses that the human
factor has been brushed aside. We have become impersonal. No faces, no eyes, no
discussions….just serial numbers and this is the result of that.
Agriculture cannot be impersonal. It is a living
science. It is a science of human touching bases. It is very holistic in
nature.
In the early years (before 1980’s), students apply
to be in KPM because they want to do
agriculture. Why do they want….maybe because they are interested to learn
agriculture and to practice agriculture or to teach agriculture. We know life
in agriculture is not plain sailing. Some had to be posted into areas where
“jin kena tendang” these were the areas where new schemes like FELDA was being
opened then. Posted to Sabah and Sarawak in 1980’s is no joke then. But we
still applied to be enrolled into KPM. We were interviewed and shortlisted and
some had to go for final interview before being admitted into KPM. That was
then.
When we graduated with only a Diploma Pertanian we
were sought after even before we graduated because previous graduates had the
reputation of being hardy, streetwise, innovative and KPI oriented. Many were
even recruited by non-agricultural companies due to the flexibility and
versatility of the Diploma Pertanian graduates then. They can do almost any job
given to them.
But that was then…………..
What’s wrong with it now ?
Now because of computerization
even though a brilliant student applies to take agriculture because he is
interested in agriculture, the computer
will determine which university he will be placed in and to do what course.
Because when he applies to the IPU he has to give three (3) optional choices of
courses that he is interested in. And the computer or the computer behind the
keyboard will decide for the student.
In the end…..we will have
students who are not interested to do agriculture taking agriculture because
the computer says so and because not many really want to take agriculture as a
course and so they have no other options but to do agriculture by force……
Years down the line we will have
lots of agricultural graduates who are not interested in doing or practicing
agriculture but being made Agricultural Officers or Assistant Agricultural
Officers resulting in them doing the work just to fill up the time or waiting
to get a better offer. In a rude way they become agricultural misfits in a very
important role and position and achieving very little. The farmers are not
getting a fair deal and the nation (Malaysia) is not getting a fair deal and
this is where we are at now.
Ofcourse not all agricultural
graduate are misfits but that is the gist of it.
We tend to have a mismatch of
quality of personnel to job specification in agriculture.
The graduates may have the
knowledge but the reality is that we have graduates whose hearts are not really
in agriculture because they were forced into agriculture.
Why can’t we have interviews and
not computers only to admit students into universities for courses that require
human touch.
As mentioned earlier, before the
mid-80’s the emphasis in KPM/UPM was theory and practical knowledge in
agriculture plus extention education skills and there were lots of in-field training.
This is because the soon-to-be graduates will be a major force for the country
to move agriculture…..they will be the major engine of change. Knowledge of
agricultural science simplified to be transferred to the farmers and this is
where the importance of the quality of the graduates are so important.
Upon graduating, back then you
would be almost immediately absorbed into the agricultural workforce. However
if you are assigned to the government departments then you may be an
Agricultural Officer (degree holder) or Assistant Agricultural Officer (diploma
holder). At the State level, the officers were provided or given some
incentives to stay within their operating area so that they would be near the
farmers and be with the farmers even after office hours. Everything can be
centered around the officer as he can be met a coffee shops, surau, masjid,
community centers and shops, practically there in the area all the time. This
was the modus operandi of the agricultural officer…..then.
Now such perks (not really perks)
are not being provided to ensure that the required officer be in the area of
work. So he may be working in Perlis and staying in Alor Setar (Kedah). They
try to come on time but certainly go back on time so that he can reach his home
about 40 minutes away not too late to go for the pasar minggu or doing other
chores with the family.
If the Government is serious
about the state of health of AGRICULTURE in Malaysia……then the Government must
relook at the present condition and practice of work as well as to the
specification of the workforce.
There is no point in the
university producing graduates that the industry is not happy with. Are we
producing products that the market wants or desires ? Or are we producing
because we have to produce them……it’s like TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT. Surely we can
do better for the nation and to ensure that the Malaysian stomachs are being
fed regularly and at affordable prices.
HOW DO WE ENTICE STUDENTS TO BE
INTERESTED IN AGRICULTURE ?
1.
The university must produce graduates that the
market wants.
2.
Courses must be tailor-made to the industry
3.
If agriculture is important to the nation, then
the Government should consider providing with incentives or special allowances
to be agricultural graduates. Similar to personnel working in specialize
fields. Just how important is agriculture to the nation ? Why can’t the
authorities provide these agricultural soldiers with government owned housing
and these officers are required to stay in that house within the working area
thus ensuring that they are with the farmers most of the time. This is where
technology transfer is more easily done and confidence build-up to the agency,
the Government as well as to the system.
4.
With internet being the “in thing” lots of
information can be gathered from but it is never the same without the human
factor. How would the aging farmers translate modern technology into practical
actions and harvest the yield. This can only be done through a trained human
interface.
5.
On the question of aging agricultural population
in Malaysia being about 67 years old on the average….I am the Government
realized it but what are they going to do about it. If this phenomena is not
arrested and a solution to overcome it then we may be faced later with lots of
“tanah terbiar” and the land become more uneconomical to work on. This is
because the younger rural youth are not interested to in the agricultural
business as it is being looked at as inferior in nature
6.
How do we get the younger generation to be
genuinely interested in the agricultural business. I am not talking about the
“flash of the pan” type of promo agricultural business where newspaper and tv
coverage is being hyped up and after a season or two…..it fizzles away. The key
word here is GENUINELY INTERESTED not just because the Government have a
program to get agriculture moving. If that is the case then it will only be a
short term program and will not last.
7.
Also agriculture must now be on a commercial
scale operation. This cannot be done unless unproductive size fields can be
contiguous to the next and making them more sizable and more economically
viable in nature to operate at commercial scale. This is because more efficient
machines are being used with less interruptions of land division boundaries and
less manpower to do the whole work. Thus it becomes a more efficient operation
and will result in a cheaper operational cost per unit of yield
production.
In short…..the Government must view the profession
as an agriculturalist as important to the national interest. Therefore the
Government should UPGRADE the status of the agricultural human resource chain.
The officers should be proud to be an agriculturalist and that agriculture is a
noble field to be involve with.
To the public….the agricultural officers must be
viewed to be “special” then only we can expect to have more people to apply to
be in the Faculty of Agriculture or in the agricultural sciences as
student…..better scholarship scheme, better training methods and better
potential to go up the promotion ladder in the long run.
Without these serious considerations……agriculture
will remain in it’s present dismal situation. Then we have nobody to blame but
to the policy makers.
Please bear in mind that….that hungry stomachs may
and could lead towards future anarchy. Once the ball of anarchy starts to
roll….there is no way you can stop it easily.
TAKE HEED.